uttapen

R1 vs R1 0528

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, R1 0528 comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureR1R1 0528
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-r1deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528
Context64,000 tokens163,840 tokens
Max output16,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens203,088 toman145,063 toman
Output / 1M tokens725,313 toman623,769 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request1,207 toman999 toman
Input cachingNo101,544 toman / 1M
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

R1

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
1,207 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

R1 0528

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
999 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-r1",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1