uttapen

R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek V3

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, DeepSeek V3 comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureR1 Distill Llama 70BDeepSeek V3
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70bdeepseek/deepseek-chat
Context8,192 tokens163,840 tokens
Max output7,372 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens232,100 toman92,840 toman
Output / 1M tokens232,100 toman258,211 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request603 toman456 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
JSON outputNoYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
603 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

DeepSeek V3

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
456 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-chat"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1