uttapen

DeepSeek V3 vs R1 Distill Llama 70B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, DeepSeek V3 comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureDeepSeek V3R1 Distill Llama 70B
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-chatdeepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b
Context163,840 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens7,372 tokens
Input / 1M tokens92,840 toman232,100 toman
Output / 1M tokens258,211 toman232,100 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request456 toman603 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputYesNo
Reasoning modeNoYes

Which one for what?

DeepSeek V3

  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
456 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
603 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "deepseek/deepseek-chat",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1