uttapen

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else.

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashLlama 4 Scout
ProviderByteDance SeedMeta
Model idbytedance-seed/seed-1.6-flashmeta-llama/llama-4-scout
Context262,144 tokens1,310,720 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens16,384 tokens
Input / 1M tokens21,759 toman29,013 toman
Output / 1M tokens87,038 toman87,038 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request141 toman151 toman
Input cachingNoNo
Image inputYesYes
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Seed 1.6 Flash

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
141 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Llama 4 Scout

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
151 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "bytedance-seed/seed-1.6-flash",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "meta-llama/llama-4-scout"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1