uttapen

Trinity Large Thinking vs R1 Distill Llama 70B

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Trinity Large Thinking comes out about 1.5× cheaper.

FeatureTrinity Large ThinkingR1 Distill Llama 70B
ProviderArceeDeepSeek
Model idarcee-ai/trinity-large-thinkingdeepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b
Context262,144 tokens8,192 tokens
Max output80,000 tokens7,372 tokens
Input / 1M tokens72,531 toman232,100 toman
Output / 1M tokens232,100 toman232,100 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request396 toman603 toman
Input caching17,408 toman / 1MNo
Image inputNoNo
File inputNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
JSON outputNoNo
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Trinity Large Thinking

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
  • High-volume work where cost per call decides
396 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
603 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1