uttapen

Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Claude Fable 5

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) comes out about 1.3× cheaper.

FeatureClaude Opus 4.1 (batch)Claude Fable 5
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4.1:batchanthropic/claude-fable-5
Context200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output32,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input / 1M tokens2,175,938 toman2,901,250 toman
Output / 1M tokens10,879,688 toman14,506,250 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request16,972 toman22,630 toman
Input caching217,594 toman / 1M290,125 toman / 1M
Image inputYesYes
File inputYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesYes

Which one for what?

Claude Opus 4.1 (batch)

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
16,972 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Claude Fable 5

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
22,630 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4.1:batch",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "anthropic/claude-fable-5"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1