uttapen

Aion-2.0 vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Both sit behind the same key and the same code on uttapen — the only thing that changes is the model string, so you can run each of them against your own workload without touching anything else. On cost, GPT-4.1 Mini comes out about 1.2× cheaper.

FeatureAion-2.0GPT-4.1 Mini
ProviderAion LabsOpenAI
Model idaion-labs/aion-2.0openai/gpt-4.1-mini
Context131,072 tokens1,047,576 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Input / 1M tokens232,100 toman116,050 toman
Output / 1M tokens464,200 toman464,200 toman
≈ one 1,000-word request905 toman754 toman
Input caching58,025 toman / 1M29,013 toman / 1M
Image inputNoYes
File inputNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
JSON outputYesYes
Reasoning modeYesNo

Which one for what?

Aion-2.0

  • Multi-step problems, maths, and tracking down a bug
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
905 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

GPT-4.1 Mini

  • Whole documents or a codebase in a single request
  • Reading screenshots, invoices, and scanned forms
  • Agents that call your own APIs and database
754 toman per 1,000 words · Model page

Run both with the same code

Swap the model value between the two ids and send the same request twice; what each answer cost comes back in the X-Uttapen-Cost-Toman header.

curl https://api.uttapen.ir/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-up-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "aion-labs/aion-2.0",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Introduce yourself in one sentence."}],
    "stream": true
  }'

model = "openai/gpt-4.1-mini"

More comparisons: all pairs · model rankings · full catalogue

base_url = https://api.uttapen.ir/v1